10/21/2021 0 Comments Is A Mac Mini Good For Video Editing
It offers improved performance over its predecessor (except perhaps in the RAM department, where the M1 maxes out at 16GB and the older Intel model maxed out at 64GB), offers an excellent experience for daily use, and has the power to chew through intensive tasks like photo and video editing.We got our hands on a 13" MacBook Pro with the new M1 chip to see if it's something filmmakers should consider, or if it's better to hold off.Heres Roger Sengs video on editing with Premiere Pro and the M1 Mac Mini. Testing conducted by Apple in October 2020 using preproduction Mac mini.All in all, the M1-powered Mac Mini has proven to be a real asset in the short time since its release. The new chip is found in the Mac Mini, MacBook Pro, and MacBook Air, which are already shipping.Final Cut Pro revolutionizes post-production with 360 video editing and motion. The trillion-dollar tech company has moved on from Intel and switched over to its own Apple Silicon, built on ARM architecture. We will get more into those as we go through this, but the big points are this: Apps need to be optimized for M1 (Apple Silicon) chips No dedicated GPU or eGPU supportApple has, yet again, made a major change in computer hardware. Before we get into Ross’ results, I want to say as an M1 Mac mini owner that it is an incredibly powerful machine for video editing with some very big caveats.It will have some obvious benefits for filmmakers as our favorite iOS apps can now run on macOS.But that isn't the only reason Apple made the switch.ARM systems are designed to do more while consuming less power. This will make it easier for developers to have an app run on an iPhone, iPad, or Mac, for instance. The new system is called Apple Silicon, and it's built on the ARM architecture, which is what is used in iOS. This made for some real advances for Apple in the marketplace, plus, it was great for developers.The new chip is called the M1 chip. This was great since it made it easy to move applications back and forth between PC and Mac, which was harder on previous generations which used the PowerPC architecture Apple used the 14 years before that. Prior to that, he talks about editing off.Before we dig into the particulars, we should spend some time going over what makes these Mac different from previous versions.For the last 14 years, Apple has built their computers around Intel architecture.
With the M1, both the CPU and the GPU are able to use the same shared memory, called unified memory. ARM should make that easier to do, while the machine will also stay cooler.It's also important to understand that the new design is built around an SoC (System on a Chip), which more tightly integrates components than the previous system.Gone are the days when you would hunt for systems with the RAM and video ram (or VRAM) when shopping for a video editing and color grading machine. We always want to plug into wall power, but sometimes we need to do an edit on an airplane, train, or out in the middle of nowhere. This is one of the keys to why the M1 is interesting for filmmakers. This meant that filmmakers showing up to set with a 16" MacBook Pro were immediately hunting to plug in and get the most their computer can deliver.ARM-based Apple Silicon should be able to deliver more of its horsepower while running on battery, and that battery should last longer. Most filmmakers know that an Intel Apple laptop throttles power significantly when you're unplugged from the wall outlet. If the CPU is super fast but its connection to drives is slow, work in Resolve or Final Cut will be slow. Those numbers are insanely impressive in terms of how fast the new M1 Apple Silicon chips are running versus Intel, especially since the programs they tested, like Lightroom, are not optimized for Apple Silicon, and thus, run through an emulation layer.In addition to Barefeets, you should also check in with Dork in A Tent, a popular DIT blog, who has been testing the new M1 based Mac Mini, and it's undeniably fast in pure testing.However, benchmarks can show you one thing, and real-world tests are another matter altogether.What matters is how the whole system works together. If you don't already follow Barefeets, they are among the best, and they have already launched some pure numbers on the M1 versus Intel that are worth a look. ![]() Is A Mini Good For Video Editing Software Should JustAnd things were legitimately faster. Working with Premiere felt just as snappy as responsive as it did on Intel, perhaps even more soon. Whatever magic Apple had to work with Rosetta 2 seemed to work just fine. The curiosity is if it will work more slowly since it's running through an emulation layer.Despite needing to go an additional layer, we were still very impressed. The software should just work. ![]() ![]() It's actually pretty nifty.It's worth noting eGPU units don't work with the new Apple Silicon. You can fire up your favorite iOS apps a run them just fine on the M1 Macs. Apps are just not appearing in the Mac store at all, even with a warning.But when you do find them, they do work. Download new minecraft launcher for macI personally had debated getting a 2020 16" MacBook Pro as a "last powerful Intel machine" to keep using for my favorite legacy software, but now having actually used the new Apple Silicon, I just can't see myself investing that kind of coin in a machine that has a ticking clock on it. This also means that, at least until 2023, you can feel confident that your Intel Mac will continue to be supported both by Apple and by third-party developers.However, at this point, unless I had a really compelling short-term need, I would not spend money on anything Apple with an Intel processor again. Time will tell.Apple has promised that this is a two-year transition, which means we could be waiting until 2022 for an Apple Silicon-based Mac Pro tower. However, it's also possible that Apple will launch a 16" MacBook Pro next year and a new Mac Pro the year after that, and they are just so screamingly graphics powerful that an eGPU doesn't even feel necessary. Thunderbolt 3 should have the bandwidth to make that possible. Since older eGPU's have their own memory, this would likely be incredibly complicated for the system to navigate, or possibly without benefit.I personally hope that within six months we'll see an eGPU specifically designed to work with Apple Silicon. By moving to an SoC design they're able to leverage things they're good at to make a machine that's just surprising in its performance. Intel machines will get support for years to come, but the reality is that Apple has done something very impressive here.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorHeidi ArchivesCategories |